Please tell us what you think of this article by clicking on a button & rating it:-
USA: Bush Hands Over Reins of U.S. Economy to EU
Date Posted: Friday 28-Nov-2008Submitted by David Y:
Newsmax.com
Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:28 PM
By: Dick Morris & Eileen McGann
The results of the G-20 economic summit amount to nothing less than the seamless integration of the United States into the European economy.
In one month of legislation and one diplomatic meeting, the United States has unilaterally abdicated all the gains for the concept of free markets won by the Reagan administration and surrendered, in total, to the Western European model of socialism, stagnation, and excessive government regulation.
Sovereignty is out the window. Without a vote, we are suddenly members of the European Union. Given the dismal record of those nations at creating jobs and sustaining growth, merging with the Europeans is like a partnership with death.
At the G-20 meeting, Bush agreed to subject the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and our other regulatory agencies to the supervision of a global entity that would critique its regulatory standards and demand changes if it felt they were necessary. Bush agreed to create a College of Supervisors.
According to The Washington Post, it would "examine the books of major financial institutions that operate across national borders so regulators could begin to have a more complete picture of banks' operations."
Their scrutiny would extend to hedge funds and to various "exotic" financial instruments. The International Monetary Fund (IMF), a European-dominated operation, would conduct "regular vigorous reviews" of American financial institutions and practices.
The European-dominated College of Supervisors would also weigh in on issues like executive compensation and investment practices.
There is nothing wrong with the substance of this regulation.
Experience is showing it is needed. But it is very wrong to delegate these powers to unelected, international institutions with no political accountability.
We have a Securities and Exchange Commission appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, both of whom are elected by the American people. It is with the SEC, the Treasury, and the Federal Reserve that financial accountability must take place.
The European Union achieved this massive subrogation of American sovereignty the way it usually does, by negotiation, gradual bureaucratic encroachment, and without asking the voters if they approve.
What's more, Bush appears to have gone down without a fight, saving his debating time for arguing against the protectionism that France's Nicolas Sarkozy was pushing.
By giving Bush a seeming victory on a moratorium against protectionism for one year, Sarkozy was able to slip over his massive scheme for taking over the supervision of the U.S. economy.
All kinds of political agendas are advancing under the cover of responding to the global financial crisis.
Where Franklin Roosevelt saved capitalism by regulating it, Bush, to say nothing of Obama, has given the government control over our major financial and insurance institutions. And it isn't even our government!
The power has now been transferred to the international community, led by the socialists in the European Union.
Will Obama govern from the left? He doesn't have to.
George W. Bush has done all the heavy lifting for him. It was under Bush that the government basically took over as the chief stockholder of our financial institutions and under Bush that we ceded our financial controls to the European Union.
In doing so, he has done nothing to preserve what differentiates the vibrant American economy from those dying economies in Europe.
Why have 80 percent of the jobs that have been created since 1980 in the industrialized world been created in the United States? How has America managed to retain its leading 24 percent share of global manufacturing even in the face of the Chinese surge?
How has the U.S. GDP risen so high that it essentially equals that of the European Union, whose population is 50 percent greater?
It has done so by an absence of stifling regulation, a liberation of capital to flow to innovative businesses, low taxes, and by a low level of unionization that has given business the flexibility to grow and prosper.
Europe, stagnated by taxation and regulation, has grown by a pittance while we have roared ahead. But now Bush — not Obama — Bush has given that all up and caved in to European socialists.
The Bush legacy? European socialism. Who needs enemies with friends like Bush?
© 2008 Dick Morris & Eileen McGann
Posted By: JoAn
*AfricanCrisis Volunteer*
Readers' Comments
Date Posted: Friday 28-Nov-2008
~
AMERICA, go back to the principals which excisted for 100+ years after 1776.
1) Close down the Reserve Bank (Fed) and confiscate all their assets.
2) Open a State Bank, go back to the Gold Standard and lend only to American Citizens (at zero interest) BUT only to those who are able to pay back the loan.
3) Give the UN and any other Cabal Group 72 hours notice to close shop and get out.
4) Close the borders, round up all illegals and ship them out.
5) Cut all taxes drastically. (to the rich as well as the poor)
If not you're going to be stuffed, as "Those who fail to face the truth and prepare accordingly will learn by the sledgehammer of events!"
And last but not least:
"Never argue with Bolshevics/Communists/Socialist because they'll always drag you down to their level!"
Spiculum
Date Posted: Friday 28-Nov-2008
What a load of cr@p!
Take Scandinavia and Finland. They are extremely prosperous countries with top notch healthcare and education system (Finland ranks one in PISA test), a shrinking public debt much lower than the US, government budget and trade balance in surplus (compare to the US twin deficit courtesy of George Bush disastrous economic policies) and yet in each of these countries, GDP per capita has grown faster than that of the US in the last decade.
Lars Pluss
San Francisco CA
USA
Date Posted: Friday 28-Nov-2008
Codswallop!!
Jane
Norway